WHO wary of COVID-19 Plasma treatment as the US pushes for it

Plasma Therapy
Representational Image
By Rahul Vaimal, Associate Editor
  • Follow author on

Right after the United States issued emergency authorization for the treatment, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has endorsed caution towards the use of recovered COVID-19 patients’ plasma to treat those who are ill, saying evidence it works remains “low quality”.

So-called convalescent plasma, which has long been used to treat diseases, is the latest talking point in the race to find effective therapies for COVID-19.

The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has earlier this week authorized its use after President Donald Trump blamed the agency for impeding the roll-out of vaccines and therapeutics for political reasons.

The technique involves taking antibody-rich plasma from patients who have recovered from COVID-19 and giving it to those who are suffering from severe active infections in hopes they will recover more quickly.

Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, WHO chief scientist, said only a few clinical trials of convalescent plasma have produced results, and the evidence, at least so far, has not been convincing enough to endorse it beyond use as an experimental therapy. While a few trials have shown some benefit, she said, they have been small and their data, so far, inconclusive.

“At the moment, it’s still very low-quality evidence. So we recommend that convalescent plasma is still an experimental therapy, it should continue to be evaluated in well-designed randomized clinical trials,” she added.

Whatever evidence is available on the effectiveness of the therapy is inconclusive. One Chinese study showed plasma from people who have recovered from coronavirus failed to make a difference in hospitalized patients, while another, a pooled analysis showed it can lower the risk of death.

One challenge as described by Dr. Swaminathan was plasma’s variability since it is drawn from many different people, producing a product that is less-standardized than monoclonal antibodies crafted in the lab.

World Health Organization senior adviser Bruce Aylward added that beyond plasma’s efficacy, there were also potential safety risks that must be vetted.

“There are a number of side effects,” Aylward said, ranging from mild fevers to severe lung injuries or circulatory overload. “For that reason, the clinical trial results are extremely important.”

The U.S. National Institutes of Health this month announced it was giving several million dollars toward a mid-stage convalescent plasma trial.

YOU MAY LIKE